9610 Employment Litigation: Admissibility of Evidence Issues
Price: $ 119.00 (USD)
Add to Cart
You will receive 1.5 credits (CE) upon completion of this course.
Have a question about this course? .
Course Description
A panel of three judges and three attorneys experienced with employment law discuss �me too� evidence, stray remarks, statistics, agency findings, and investigation documents as used as evidence in employment discrimination and hostile environment cases. In describing the circumstances under which these types of evidence are most likely to be admitted or excluded, and why, the panelists refer to over twenty actual cases, which are included in full, as well as to the specific Federal Rules of Evidence and their own experiences in this area.
Back to Top
Course Outline
Employment Litigation: Admissibility of Evidence Issues
I. “Me Too” Evidence
A. “Me Too” Evidence
B. Admitting “Me Too” Evidence
C. Hostile Environment Cases
D. Type of Workplace
E. Statistical Evidence
F. Reverse “Me Too” Evidence
G. More Reverse “Me Too” Evidence
II. Stray Remarks
A. Wallace v. Methodist Hospital
B. Manning v. Charlestown Hospital
C. Griffin v. Washington Convention Center
D. All Stray Remarks Are Not Equal
E. Factors in Admitting Stray Remarks
F. Influence of the “Bad Guy”
G. Different Circuits, Different Results
H. Discriminatory Animus
III. Admitting Agency Findings
A. Two Schools of Thought
B. Agency Trustworthiness
C. Determining Trustworthiness
D. Agency Conclusions
IV. Investigation Documents
A. Limits of Privilege
B. Waiver
C. Protecting Work Product
D. Position Statement Changes
E. Briefs
V. Questions & Answers
A. Outside Attorney as Witness
B. Admissible Reverse “Me Too”
C. Deposing EEOC Investigators
AfterWordsSM
Back to Top
I. “Me Too” Evidence
A. “Me Too” Evidence
B. Admitting “Me Too” Evidence
C. Hostile Environment Cases
D. Type of Workplace
E. Statistical Evidence
F. Reverse “Me Too” Evidence
G. More Reverse “Me Too” Evidence
II. Stray Remarks
A. Wallace v. Methodist Hospital
B. Manning v. Charlestown Hospital
C. Griffin v. Washington Convention Center
D. All Stray Remarks Are Not Equal
E. Factors in Admitting Stray Remarks
F. Influence of the “Bad Guy”
G. Different Circuits, Different Results
H. Discriminatory Animus
III. Admitting Agency Findings
A. Two Schools of Thought
B. Agency Trustworthiness
C. Determining Trustworthiness
D. Agency Conclusions
IV. Investigation Documents
A. Limits of Privilege
B. Waiver
C. Protecting Work Product
D. Position Statement Changes
E. Briefs
V. Questions & Answers
A. Outside Attorney as Witness
B. Admissible Reverse “Me Too”
C. Deposing EEOC Investigators
AfterWordsSM
More Information
| Language | English |
| Course Length | 1.47 hours |
| Duration of Access | for 3 months from day of enrollment |
| Continuing Education Credits | 1.5 |
| Instructor | Edward T. Ellis, John M. Facciola, Robert B. Fitzpatrick, Joseph D. Garrison, Paul W. Grimm, Joseph E. Irenas |
| Vendor | Cognistar (Read more about Cognistar accreditation.) |
| Course Certification | CLE credit available, see details for each course for states where available |
| Prerequisites/Audience | intended for attorneys and law students |
| Requirements/Materials Included | computer with Internet access |
Price: $ 119.00 (USD)
Add to Cart